<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>whatisboom? &#187; Loot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatisboom.com/tag/loot/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatisboom.com</link>
	<description>Two parts rocket fuel, one part luck.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 05:19:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>My third opinion.</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisboom.com/169/my-third-opinion</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatisboom.com/169/my-third-opinion#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Koriel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Loot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raiding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WoW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WotLK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dungeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emblems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heroics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisboom.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so now after a]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so now after a long thought process after the release of 3.2, I&#8217;ve finally come to a conclusion. I don&#8217;t so much mind that Blizzard revamped the Emblem system to make older content more appealing to &#8220;geared&#8221; players, however I feel the addition of the daily heroic (and soon to be weekly raid) quests are bad for the game. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to feel that I <strong>must</strong> run old content to get current tier gear. I think the addition of EoTriumph&#8217;s to the weekly raid heroic was a mistake, and should have just been two extra conquests. If you run one ToC lockout, you get 15 Emblems of Triumph. Doing the daily heroic each day, net&#8217;s you 14 EoTs each week.</p>
<p>I think its perfectly reasonable to offer &#8220;free access&#8221; to the previous tier of gear, having heroic emblems be Conquest and ToC dropping Triumph. </p>
<p>Now don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not being elitist. ToC isn&#8217;t hard and its pugged several times a day on my realm (I usually pug it 2-3 times a week on my alts), but I don&#8217;t feel that a players gear progression should be held to how many heroics he runs each week.</p>
<p>*rant over*</p>
<p>PS &#8211; Trying to get up the material for my Tank Grid/UI post, but having started a new job, I&#8217;m a little inundated with work right now.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.whatisboom.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatisboom.com/169/my-third-opinion/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pugs and gearing</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisboom.com/63/pugs-and-gearing</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatisboom.com/63/pugs-and-gearing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Koriel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raiding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WoW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dungeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisboom.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To continue my last post,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To continue my last post, I have been pugging a lot.</p>
<p>Having moved my paladin back to my old home server, his friends list isn&#8217;t the largest, and the guild is still small. I fond myself pugging, for multiple reasons. First is obvious, just trying to get the group going, but secondly a good instance run is a great way to impress people and hopefully get some new recruits.  </p>
<p>Up until now, I have been pretty east going about who I pug with.  I&#8217;ve got a few exceptions, that I&#8217;ll probably cover in a post immediately following this one. Generally I just slap a group together and hit some instance, but after reading a few threads on <a href="http://failsafedesign.com/maintankadin/">maintankadin</a> I have been thinking about changing my game plan.</p>
<p>In a recent run there was an arms warrior that was rolling against me on tank gear. Now I know it&#8217;s just blue loot, nothing to get that upset about, however I would have rolled on the dps plate that dropped, however I had a retribution guild mate of mine in the group, and I didn&#8217;t want to piss on his chances. During my reading tonight, one line caught my eye, &#8220;if you want to roll on tank gear, go tank for your own group&#8221;. That just makes so much sense to me.  I&#8217;m here trying to gear up my main set for progression and you&#8217;re stealing my upgrades so you can never use them.</p>
<p>So, in conclusion, I think I&#8217;ll probably keep my groups open, however I&#8217;m probably going to be much more of an asshole when inviting other plate classes. </p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.whatisboom.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatisboom.com/63/pugs-and-gearing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
