• Links
  • Blogroll
  • Characters
  • One of the original posts I wanted to write for this blog was a discussion about the different kinds of people that make up particular classes.

    I think the two most prevalent cases are tanks and dps. In general, dps accepts damage meters such as recount, are the end all of who’s doing the best, but tanks are a little harder to sort out. This leads to tanks boasting about gear, stats, avoidances, and all other things they might be able to bring to the table.

    In a world that is as unquantified as tanking, its often very difficult to match up exact tanks against other tanks, especially when the 3 (soon to be 4) classes have varying degrees of differences. Additionally, most of the fights that blizzard designs, have 1 target to tank, and if there are more, they are often clearly designated as “off tank” style mobs. Trash usually requires more than one tank, but when you get to the boss (read: important) fight the other tanks are sidelined. This causes a bit of an inferiority complex in the additional tanks.

    This will be alleviated a bit when Blizzard implements the “dual-spec” system, as dps/tanks will be able to switch back and forth, and the tanks won’t feel like such a lame duck when they are attempting to dps for boss fights.

    Posted in: TBC, WoW, WotLK
    Displaying Comments

    I’ve always considered the primary measure of how well a tank performs is how well they manage the tasks necessary for their role. As you pointed out in an earlier post, tanks have so many tasks they have to perform, marking, positioning of boss/trash, aggro management (when to taunt and when to let someone tank the mob they pulled), and so many other factors. In other words, a tank should not be judged by what they can bring to the table, but how well they perform at the table.

    6:15 am